Category Archives: Amateur Radio

Williams group attempting to form emergency communications group

In the 50s, the national government established the Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service (RACES). The current rules for RACES can be found in Title 47, Part 97, Subpart E, of the Code of Federal Regulations. Subpart E is provided in its entirety at the end of this article.

Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations covers all of the rules established by the Federal Communications Commission over the years. It is broken up into parts which cover the various areas for which the FCC has authority. For example, Part 95 covers Citizens Band, Family Service, General Mobile Radio Service and Multi-Use Radio Services among other things. Part 97 is all about Amateur Radio. In Amateur Radio, we simply refer to Part 95 or Part 97. It is understood that we mean 47 C.F.R.

RACES was established as a part of the Civil Defense effort to respond in case of a nuclear attack. The idea was that if telephones and other means of communications were down, we could still pass communications across the country. It was the first Internet. {The effects of Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) were not fully understood at the time. It is interesting that it was discovered that vacuum tubes were less susceptible to EMP than the solid-state devises in use today. But I digress.}

Originally you had to have a special license to be a member of RACES. I understand the FCC has since let the program wane and they are not issuing licenses for RACES anymore. Some RACES licenses still exist and the organization is still active, though I am not quite sure what the membership requirements are. The idea is that only RACES licensees could communicate with another RACES licensee. They were only activated in event of Civil Defense war-type activities. This law does provide that any amateur radio operator could communicate to save life or property.

ARES (Pronounced air-ease) is the Amateur Radio Emergency Service established by the Amateur Radio Relay League (ARRL). It does not have any regulation specifically outlined in Part 97. The ARRL has worked with the FCC since the FCC was formed in 1934, however. Thus the ARES is recognized by the FCC and other government entities.

It should be noted that REACT is the same. It grew out of the popularity of Citizens Band radio in the 60s and 70s. They monitored channel 9 for emergencies and the FCC eventually regulated channel 9 as the official emergency channel on CB radios. Channel 19 is used for traffic information. Today licenses are not required for CB, but you must still follow FCC regulations or you can be fined heavily.

ARES was developed as an amateur radio group to respond to all types of emergencies. It is designed to respond if an event is pending. This could be any man-made or natural disaster. Locally we have had several incidents over the years which cause ARES to respond.

In February of 2015, a damaged fiber optic cable caused telephone and Internet disruption throughout northern Arizona. This included 911 services. ARES was activated. It was actually this event that inspired me to get an amateur license. In October 2016, a prescribed burn caused visibility problems on Interstate 40 causing an accident and stopping traffic for hours. During our first winter storm over Christmas, a 28-car pile up occurred on I-40 blocking traffic for hours in Williams. A similar incident occurred on I-17 south of Flagstaff.

ARES operators monitored scanners and the repeaters in Flagstaff and Williams during these incidents. If a person in these situations lost cell phone service and ran out of gas, they could have called for help on a radio. That is what emergency communications is about. It is not only about catastrophic disasters such as Katrina. It is also important for minor emergencies such as those listed above. Of course if you are caught in one of these “minor emergencies,” it is not minor to you.

There is an effort afoot to create an emergency communications group in Williams and the surrounding area to extend the emergency communications capability of the ARES group centered in Flagstaff. Cooperation of all radio services is essential. In fact, it is required by the Federal Communications Commission. If emergency communications are started on any repeater or frequency, all normal conversational use MUST CEASE.

The Williams Emergency Communications group (Working title. It may change.) is forming for just this purpose. They intend to set up a “band plan” reserving certain channels of Citizens Band, GMRS/FRS and MURS channels for emergency use. They intend to leave open most channels for general communications between families during an emergency. Anyone is eligible to join. However if you have a felony record, you cannot obtain an FCC amateur radio license. You can have your rights restored, however, under certain conditions. If you cannot get a license, or don’t want to, we can still use help from runners and log keepers.

Anyone from Ash Fork, Valle, Tusayan and the outlying areas are welcome to join. There are ARES groups in all counties and we will interact with all of them

If you opt for an amateur license, there are a lot of fun activities you can join in on. There are contests, field days and simply being able to communicate around the world for fun. Anyone who can pass the amateur radio exam is eligible for a license.

If you decide to get a GMRS license, there are certain advantages, as well. You are allowed to use the higher power on GMRS channels giving you extended range. You can also use open GMRS repeaters to extend range even further, using your FCC issued call sign. If the head of a household gets the license, all of the family members can use the radios using the call sign. No foul language or business use is permitted.


Subpart E—Providing Emergency Communications

§ 97.401 Operation during a disaster.
A station in, or within 92.6 km (50 nautical miles) of, Alaska may transmit emissions J3E and R3E on the channel at 5.1675 MHz (assigned frequency 5.1689 MHz) for emergency communications.
The channel must be shared with stations licensed in the Alaska-Private Fixed Service. The transmitter power must not exceed 150 W PEP. A station in, or within 92.6 km of, Alaska may transmit communications for tests and training drills necessary to ensure the establishment, operation, and maintenance of emergency communication systems.

§ 97.403 Safety of life and protection of property.
No provision of these rules prevents the use by an amateur station of any means of radio communication at its disposal to provide essential communication needs in connection with the immediate safety of human life and immediate protection of property when normal communication systems are not available.

§ 97.405 Station in distress.
(a) No provision of these rules prevents the use by an amateur station in 47 CFR Ch. I (10–1–09 Edition) distress of any means at its disposal to attract attention, make known its condition and location, and obtain assistance.
(b) No provision of these rules prevents the use by a station, in the exceptional circumstances described in paragraph (a) of this section, of any means of radio communications at its disposal to assist a station in distress.

§ 97.407 Radio amateur civil emergency service.
(a) No station may transmit in RACES unless it is an FCC-licensed primary, club, or military recreation station and it is certified by a civil defense organization as registered with that organization, or it is an FCC-licensed RACES station. No person may be the control operator of a RACES station, or may be the control operator of an amateur station transmitting in RACES unless that person holds a FCC-issued amateur operator license and is certified by a civil defense organization as enrolled in that organization.
(b) The frequency bands and segments and emissions authorized to the control operator are available to stations transmitting communications in RACES on a shared basis with the amateur service. In the event of an emergency which necessitates invoking the President’s War Emergency Powers under the provisions of section 706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 606, RACES stations and amateur stations participating in RACES may only transmit on the frequency segments authorized pursuant to part 214 of this chapter.
(c) A RACES station may only communicate with:
(1) Another RACES station;
(2) An amateur station registered with a civil defense organization;
(3) A United States Government station authorized by the responsible agency to communicate with RACES stations;
(4) A station in a service regulated by the FCC whenever such communication is authorized by the FCC.
(d) An amateur station registered with a civil defense organization may only communicate with:
(1) A RACES station licensed to the civil defense organization with which the amateur station is registered;
(2) The following stations upon authorization of the responsible civil defense official for the organization with which the amateur station is registered:
(i) A RACES station licensed to another civil defense organization;
(ii) An amateur station registered with the same or another civil defense organization;
(iii) A United States Government station authorized by the responsible agency to communicate with RACES stations; and
(iv) A station in a service regulated by the FCC whenever such communication is authorized by the FCC.
(e) All communications transmitted in RACES must be specifically authorized by the civil defense organization for the area served. Only civil defense communications of the following types may be transmitted:
(1) Messages concerning impending or actual conditions jeopardizing the public safety, or affecting the national defense or security during periods of local, regional, or national civil emergencies;
(2) Messages directly concerning the immediate safety of life of individuals, the immediate protection of property, maintenance of law and order, alleviation of human suffering and need, and the combating of armed attack or sabotage;
(3) Messages directly concerning the accumulation and dissemination of public information or instructions to the civilian population essential to the activities of the civil defense organization or other authorized governmental or relief agencies; and
(4) Communications for RACES training drills and tests necessary to ensure the establishment and maintenance of orderly and efficient operation of the RACES as ordered by the responsible civil defense organization served. Such drills and tests may not exceed a total time of 1 hour per week.
With the approval of the chief officer for emergency planning in the applicable State, Commonwealth, District or territory, however, such tests and drills may be conducted for a period not to exceed 72 hours no more than twice in any calendar year.

FCC Denies Expert Linears’ Request for Waiver of 15 dB Rule, Petition Pending

The FCC has denied a request by Expert Linears America LLC to waive Part 97.317(a)(2) of the Amateur Service rules limiting amplifier gain. Expert, of Magnolia, Texas, distributes linears manufactured by SPE in Italy. Its waiver request, filed in June, would have allowed Expert to import an amplifier capable of exceeding the current 15-dB gain limitation as it awaits FCC action on its April petition (RM-11767) to revise the same Amateur Service rules. That petition remains pending. Expert has asserted that there should be no gain limitation on amplifiers sold or used in the Amateur Service. Most commenters supported Expert’s waiver request, but a couple of commenters—including FlexRadio—demurred.

“In light of the conflicting comments regarding the desirability of eliminating the 15-dB limitation, we conclude that waiving the limitation at this stage of the rulemaking proceeding would prejudice the rulemaking proceeding and prematurely dispose of commenters’ concerns,” the FCC said in denying the waiver. “Moreover, we agree with FlexRadio that granting Expert’s waiver request while the rulemaking petition remains pending would provide an unfair market advantage for one equipment model over other manufacturers’ RF power amplifiers that would still be limited by [the existing rules].”

The FCC said it would rather give full consideration to “the pending issues” and apply the result of the rulemaking proceeding to all Amateur Radio Service equipment. The Commission said rule waivers “generally” are not warranted “merely to accommodate technical parameters that are based solely on harmonization with the manufacturer’s products available abroad.”

The FCC said a minority of those commenting on the waiver request expressed concern that eliminating the 15-dB limitation would lead to an overall increase in power levels, “including transmissions that intentionally or unintentionally exceed the maximum power limit.”

In its April rulemaking petition, Expert maintained that the 15-dB gain limitation is an unneeded holdover from the days when amplifiers were less efficient and the FCC was attempting to rein in the use of Amateur Service amplifiers by Citizens Band operators.

Although the FCC had proposed in 2004 to delete the requirement that amplifiers be designed to use a minimum of 50 W of drive power—and subsequently did so—it did not further discuss the 15-dB limit in the subsequent Report and Order in that proceeding.

Expert has pointed to its Model 1.3K FA amplifier as an example of a linear “inherently capable of considerably more than 15 dB of amplification,” which would make it a suitable match for low-power transceivers now on the market.

The full Report and Order can be found on the web in PDF format at, https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-149A1.pdf.

FCC Affirms Penalty for Unlicensed Amateur Operation

ARRL NEWS — The FCC has affirmed a $23,000 penalty against Daniel Delise of Astoria, New York, for operating without an Amateur Radio license on 147.96 MHz and for transmitting a false officer-in-distress call on a New York City Police Department (NYPD) radio channel. The FCC’s December 5 Forfeiture Order follows its August 31 Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (NAL), which detailed a history of complaints and alleged illegal radio operation by Delise dating to 2012.

“The penalty represents the full amount proposed in the Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, and is based on the full base forfeiture amount as well as an upward adjustment reflecting Mr. Delise’s decision to continue his misconduct after being warned that his actions violated the Communications Act and the Commission’s rules,” the FCC Forfeiture Order said. The FCC said Delise’s response to the NAL offered “no reason to cancel, withdraw, or reduce the proposed penalty.”

Last summer, ARRL Hudson Division Director Mike Lisenco, N2YBB, credited the intervention of New York Rep. Peter King with getting the case “off the back burner and up to the front of the line.” Lisenco and ARRL General Counsel Chris Imlay, W3KD, met with the Republican congressman in January to discuss ongoing interference issues in the Greater New York City/Long Island area. King subsequently wrote FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler to urge “timely and visible enforcement.”

The September 15 response to the NAL did not deny that Delise violated the Communications Act and FCC rules but argued that the FCC should reduce or cancel the fine because he is currently incarcerated and has no income or assets. The FCC turned away that argument, saying that Delise did not provide any documentation to substantiate his claim of inability to pay.

Last April, the FCC Enforcement Bureau issued a Notice of Unlicensed Operation, after determining that Delise was transmitting on 147.96 MHz, a repeater input. Not long after, the NYPD informed an FCC field agent that police had taken Delise into custody for “sending out false radio transmissions” over the NYPD radio system and for possessing radios capable of operating on NYPD frequencies, in violation of state law.

Delise, who could have been fined more than $140,000, has 30 days to pay the fine. He’s now in prison as a result of the false police call and guilty pleas to other charges.

Yaesu FTM 3200DR Transceiver Review

Just to prove I don’t just buy BaoFeng, I was going to do a review on the FTM-3200DR that I purchased. In this months issue of QST, I found they already reviewed it. Here it is.

Of course they cover just the basics. I purchased my radio used through a local Ham operator for a few dollars less than the going price about six-months ago. You can find them as low as $150 at GigaParts.

The unit is VHF only, but it is solid. It’s audio quality is so much better than my BTech UV-2501. The microphone is much better quality than the BaoFeng UV-2501 microphone. The keypad works much better. That is, of course, to be expected.

I did test the digital mode with my friend and was able to talk over 20-miles away on SIMPLEX. If memory serves, we had to use the high power mode of 65-watts.

The problem is that it is VHF and most of the people setting up Fusion repeaters establish them in UHF. It does not transmit digital pictures as do some of the higher end Yaesu models. It does not have APRS built-in. I do not know enough about the digital mode to comment much more on that feature.

The analog side, however, works great. It is relatively easy to program. It cannot be programmed with CHIRP. You can order a programming package from RT Systems for about $50.

I accidentally transmitted briefly without the antenna connected, once. I do not recommend you try it. You note that I said I did it accidentally and briefly. Amazingly it still worked without any noticeable degradation.

I use it mainly in analog mode, though with my current antenna I receive a lot of static receiving long-distance signals. When used with my local repeater it sounds great.

I really recommend new amateur radio operators look into this unit as a first mobile. I use mine on a power supply obtained through the same Ham friend. It is around the same price as the BTech UV-2501. Most of the repeaters I use are VHF, so this is not a problem for me. The FTM-3200DR, however, is more solidly built. I believe any amateur radio operator will find it is a good value.

BaoFeng UV-82HP: Much improved

uv-82hp-16-11-12-02
UV-82HP comes with all you see here. Actually it also comes with an earphone mic that I could not find for the photo.
SOURCE: BaoFeng Tech
$62.89 + Shipping

Two things really got me into the idea of amateur radio. The first was February 25, 2015 when “vandals” cut a fiber optic cable in Phoenix severing phone, Internet and credit card and debit services to northern Arizona. The second was my introduction to the BaoFeng UV-5R. The interesting part was the capability of programming the unit. Some further Internet research (After February 25, 2016 of course) revealed that amateur radio was much more advanced than I realized.

As I explained in an earlier article, I chose to go with the BaoFeng UV-82 for my first radio. I received it, programmed it and was listening in before I actually obtained my amateur license. I had to get a little help from BaoFeng Tech technical support, but the minute I received word on my license I was on the air.

I continued to purchase BaoFeng mainly because I am not rich. Not always from BaoFeng Tech. I have tried the UV-5R, BF-F9 V2+ (really a knock-off of the BF-F8HP) and the UV-2501 mobile unit. The UV-2501 makes a great portable emergency unit.

I broke my original UV-82 after about six-months of dropping it on the ground. Not intentionally, mind you. I’m just clumsy sometimes. But it held up pretty good overall.

I was finally able to replace it with a UV-82HP and was pleasantly surprised. Except for the fact that I thought I was buying the camouflage model and accidentally ordered the black. Still looks good.

When I go for new BaoFeng radios, I usually go through BaoFeng Tech because they seem to have the latest. You can go through my previous article to get the particulars of the UV-82HP because it operates exactly the same as the old unit. I even programmed it with CHIRP using my old cable and old UV-82 CHIRP image. I had to add a line, of course, for the new power level. The HP adds 8-watts to the 1- and 4-watts of the older model.

The surprise was when I went to operate it. My local critic, Ted KF7QPG, kept asking if I was on my Yaesu FTM-3200D that I use as a base. He mentioned that I usually sounded muffled, but the audio on this unit was clear. That is with the built-in microphone, not with the Kenwood mike I reviewed. I confirmed that in another QSO with J.D. N6IME. J.D. mentioned that a friend of his recently acquired the tri-band BTECH UV-5X3 ($59.89 + Shipping) and that the audio quality was much better than previous UV-5R style radios.

Another good thing is that the battery from my broken UV-82 fits the HP model, so I had an instant back-up battery. I do not know if the antennas are interchangeable because of the higher wattage. I have to remember to drop a line to BaoFeng Tech and ask.

Almost all of the radios coming through BaoFeng Tech are either tri-band or tri-power. It seems that, also, BaoFeng tech is improving the audio quality of their newer models. You can still find older models through Amazon and other online sources. They are okay if you are really on a budget. If your budget can stand just a little more strain, however, I would recommend that you check the BaoFeng Tech web site for the latest models.

Their tech support department, by the way, responds quickly to emails. I have received a reply in as little as six-hours, but usually within 24-hours you will receive some reply.

I will note that there are better hand held radios that do more. For me, it becomes a choice of loosing a $300 radio or a $70 radio. If you are just interested in making contacts and talking with friends, you really cannot beat the price. Especially if BaoFeng continues to improve.

CARC radios for Dave McKay Memorial run

Joe (W7LUX) keeps an eye on participants at one of the CARC stations.
Joe (W7LUX) keeps an eye on participants at one of the CARC stations.
FLAGSTAFF — On August 13, 2016, Flagstaff held their annual Dave McKay Memorial half marathon and 5K run/walk to benefit Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Flagstaff. The Coconino Amateur Radio Club (CARC) provided radio communications. This is just one of the major events in which CARC participates.
Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) members also participated.
Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) members also participated.
I was called in to assist. I was to go to a point on A-1 Mountain road as assigned by Ron (KG7OH); the coordinator for CARC. Unfortunately we had a really good monsoon and my vehicle could not make it. So I wandered around taking pictures.
800-hmr-16-08-13Other commitments have taken up my time (video games) so I am just now getting around to reporting on it. In between the event and this post, my cell phone expired when I tossed it out of the window of my vehicle. The information I gathered from this event was irretrievable.
One of the many CARC stations along the run. Due to the loss of my equipment, I cannot remember who these folks are. (Okay. Send me emails)
One of the many CARC stations along the run. Due to the loss of my equipment, I cannot remember who these folks are. (Okay. Send me emails)
Important equipment tip. Don’t throw your “smart phone” out the window of your vehicle. If you are patient, it will get around to doing what you want it to.
Of course credit for the success of the event goes to the runners.
Of course credit for the success of the event goes to the runners.

800-racer-16-08-13-01800-racer-16-08-13-03800-racer-16-08-13-04
We end with a picture of cattle.
We end with a picture of cattle.

Guess I’ve been gone awhile.

leash-law01As you can probably see, my last articles were basically around the May time period. I can only say that leash laws are getting a little rough.

I have been doing my normal reporting, but I have not dropped out of amateur radio. I have been working on several projects associated with that hobby. I participated in an event, decided to become ARES certified, worked on a proposal to form an emergency communication system in my community and bought some new equipment.

I will cover all of this in upcoming articles. Particularly new equipment.

Now you might think that I get to test the latest BaoFeng equipment because I’m such a widely-read reviewer. You may think that because I review a lot of BaoFeng equipment. I wish that were true, but not so. The reason is mainly cost. BaoFeng is within my retirement budget.

I have been an amateur radio operator for over a year, now. Made a lot of friends and a few enemies. I’d just like to say to you all, stop calling me Kid.

A microphone made for Baofeng

1500-Kenwood SMC-34Source: Hamcity on Amazon.

As a rookie Ham I am always on the lookout for products that help me in my communications, as is anyone. While listening in on a conversation concerning Baofeng radios, I overheard someone talking about the Kenwood SMC-34(G) microphone.

Many new amateur radio licensees start out with a Baofeng because of the low cost. With the purchase of a programming cable and free CHIRP software, a new operator can get on the air for less than $50. It is nice to add a microphone. Most go for the cheap Baofeng mics which are of poor quality. I hope to help new amateurs avoid the same trap.

I would like to have had the microphone on a recent trip that I took to try it out. I had to wait, however, until I returned home to test the Kenwood microphone. I was happy to learn that I received it a day early.

The interesting thing about Kenwood is that they use the same connector style as Baofeng on some of their microphones. This happens to be one. The first thing that I noticed was that the microphone fit tight into the microphone connector on the Baofeng. It was smaller and a little more difficult to remove.

The cord, however, stretched much better. I was able to put the Baofeng in my back pocket and run the microphone to my collar—which is, of course, the idea. I was surprised and pleased to hear that microphone clarity was good on the receive end.

The microphone, itself, is about the same size as the cheaper model, but slightly heavier. It also claims to be water resistant, but I am reluctant to dump in in a sink full of water to test it. I’ll just wait for the next rain.

If you are new to amateur radio and were attracted by the lure of the Baofeng radio, I recommend that you spend the extra money for the correct programming cable, a good extra antenna and the Kenwood SMC-34.

FCC Invites Comments on Petition to Eliminate 15 dB Gain Limit on Amateur Amplifiers

The FCC has put on public notice and invited comments on a Petition for Rule Making (RM-11767), filed on behalf of an amateur amplifier distributor, which seeks to revise the Amateur Service rules regarding maximum permissible amplifier gain. Expert Linears America LLC of Magnolia, Texas, which distributes linears manufactured by SPE in Italy, wants the FCC to eliminate the 15 dB gain limitation on amateur amplifiers, spelled out in §97.317(a)(2). Expert asserts that there should be no gain limitation at all on amplifiers sold or used in the Amateur Service.

“There is no technical or regulatory reason [that] an amplifier capable of being driven to full legal output by even a fraction of a watt should not be available to Amateur Radio operators in the United States,” Expert said in its Petition.

Read more at ARRL

Are you ready to get your Amateur Radio License?

UV-82C(1)LGIf you have been studying to get your Amateur Radio license, you have two chances coming up in May.

The Coconinco County Amateur Radio club is planning an exam for all classes of license on May 14 from 9:00 – 11:00 AM. The examination will be held at the North County Health Care classroom. The North County Health Care center is at 2920 N 4th Street in Flagstaff. Visit their web site for information on what you are required to bring for the exam.

In Yavapai county you have an opportunity to become licensed by the Yavapai Amateur Radio club. They require you to obtain an Federal Registration Number (FRN). The requirements can be found on their web site. Their next exam is also scheduled for May 14 and you can take a practice exam on Tuesday May 10. You must pre-register online. The exam will be held in the Jeep Posse Building at 255 E Gurley Street in Prescott.

Read more at Northern Arizona Gazette